# I am in removal proceedings in the United States and I was hoping an immigration judge could temporarily pause my case while a separate application fo?

- Jurisdiction: United States
- Practice area: Immigration Law
- Published: 2026-10-30
- Last updated: 2026-10-30
- Canonical: https://lawasked.com/us/immigration/i-removal-proceedings-united-states-i-hoping-immigration

## Question

I am in removal proceedings in the United States and I was hoping an immigration judge could temporarily pause my case while a separate application for relief is decided by another agency. I understand that on [REDACTED_ADDRESS] declined an emergency request to restore the 2024 regulation allowing administrative closure, leaving in place a lower-court judgment that set that regulation aside following an agreement between Texas and the Department of Justice. What does this decision mean for my case now, is it a final ruling on whether administrative closure is lawful, and what other options exist to seek a pause while another application is pending?

## Summary

It depends on whether the immigration judge exercises their discretion to grant your request. While the recent court decision limits the automatic use of certain regulations, judges still have the authority to manage their proceedings.

## Analysis

Whether you can pause your case depends on the immigration judge's authority to manage the proceedings. Under the law, an immigration judge is responsible for conducting proceedings to decide if an alien is deportable [1]. 

Regarding your specific situation, the decision you mentioned regarding the 2024 regulation means that there is no longer a broad, automatic way to use 'administrative closure' (a way to pause a case) based on that specific regulation. Because the court set that regulation aside, the judge's ability to pause your case is not as clearly defined by that specific rule. This does not necessarily mean a pause is impossible, but it means it is not a guaranteed right under that regulation. 

In removal proceedings, the judge has significant power. The law states that "The immigration judge shall administer oaths, receive evidence, and interrogate, examine, and cross-examine the alien and any witnesses" [1]. This implies the judge has control over how the hearing is conducted. 

It is currently unsettled whether the judge will use their general discretion to grant a pause (often called a stay or administrative closure) in light of the recent court ruling. The law does not explicitly provide a specific, mandatory mechanism for pausing a case just because another agency is deciding a separate application, though you may be able to argue for it based on the judge's authority to manage the case. 

State, provincial, or local laws may add further rules regarding legal representation or local court procedures; you should check with local legal resources.

## Statutory citations

- Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a - Removal proceedings [in force] (https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1229a)
  > An immigration judge shall conduct proceedings for deciding the inadmissibility or deportability of an alien.
- Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a - Removal proceedings [in force] (https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1229a)
  > The immigration judge shall administer oaths, receive evidence, and interrogate, examine, and cross-examine the alien and any witnesses.

---
General information only, not legal advice. See https://lawasked.com/disclaimer