How long you must work before unfair dismissal protection applies, by country

Four of these statutes make protection depend on service: the UK asks for two years, Canada for twelve months, Germany for more than six months, and Australia for six months or one year depending on whether the employer is a small business. Germany adds an employer-size cut-off that removes small workplaces altogether. Norway, Sweden and Japan, in the provisions quoted here, protect against dismissal without good reason without naming a service period, and Norway and Sweden instead let a probation period of up to six months run first.

Figures checked against the statute text on October 25, 2026 by Cong Ho, editor of LawAsked.

Scope of this guide

Canada: the Canada Labour Code (federal sector) and the Ontario statutes that LawAsked has loaded. Other provinces are not compared.

How long you must work before unfair dismissal protection applies, by country
Country Service neededEmployer size or exclusionsProbation window
Australia 6 months (one year for a small business employer)Small business employers have the longer one-year period
Canada 12 consecutive months of continuous employmentEmployees under a collective agreement are excluded
Germany More than 6 months without interruption in the same establishment or companyNot for establishments with 5 or fewer employees; for those with 10 or fewer, not for staff hired after 31 December 2003
Japan Not conditioned on service in this article
Norway Not conditioned on service in § 15-7Up to 6 months by written agreement; dismissal during it must relate to fit, skill or reliability
Sweden Not conditioned on service in 7 §Probation employment of at most 6 months
United Kingdom 2 years of continuous employmentSeveral listed grounds are exempt from the qualifying period

Country by country

Australia

Rule
Fair Work Act 2009 s 383
if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times
if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time
Fair Work Act 2009, Section 383. Official text

Statute text as of October 21, 2026

Canada

Rule
Canada Labour Code s 240
has completed 12 consecutive months of continuous employment by an employer
is not a member of a group of employees subject to a collective agreement
shall be made within ninety days from the date on which the person making the complaint was dismissed
Canada Labour Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. L-2, s. 240. Official text

Statute text as of October 21, 2026

Germany

Rule
KSchG § 1 and § 23
ohne Unterbrechung länger als sechs Monate bestanden hat, ist rechtsunwirksam, wenn sie sozial ungerechtfertigt ist
Kündigungsschutzgesetz, § 1 KSchG. Official text
in der Regel fünf oder weniger Arbeitnehmer ausschließlich der zu ihrer Berufsbildung Beschäftigten beschäftigt werden
in der Regel zehn oder weniger Arbeitnehmer ausschließlich der zu ihrer Berufsbildung Beschäftigten beschäftigt werden
nach dem 31. Dezember 2003 begonnen hat
Kündigungsschutzgesetz, § 23 KSchG. Official text

Statute text as of October 22, 2026

Japan

Rule
労働契約法 第16条
解雇は、客観的に合理的な理由を欠き、社会通念上相当であると認められない場合は、その権利を濫用したものとして、無効とする。
労働契約法, 労働契約法 第十六条. Official text

Statute text as of October 23, 2026

Norway

Rule
Arbeidsmiljøloven § 15-7 and § 15-6
Arbeidstaker kan ikke sies opp uten at det er saklig begrunnet
Arbeidsmiljøloven, Arbeidsmiljøloven § 15-7. Official text
Prøvetid kan avtales for en periode på inntil seks måneder.
må oppsigelsen være begrunnet i arbeidstakers tilpasning til arbeidet, faglige dyktighet eller pålitelighet
Arbeidsmiljøloven, Arbeidsmiljøloven § 15-6. Official text

Statute text as of October 23, 2026

Sweden

Rule
LAS 7 § and 6 §
Uppsägning från arbetsgivarens sida ska grunda sig på sakliga skäl.
Lag om anställningsskydd, LAS (1982:80), 7 §. Official text
om prövotiden är högst sex månader
övergår provanställningen i en tillsvidareanställning
Lag om anställningsskydd, LAS (1982:80), 6 §. Official text

Statute text as of October 23, 2026

United Kingdom

Rule
Employment Rights Act 1996 s 108
unless he has been continuously employed for a period of not less than two years ending with the effective date of termination
Subsection (1) does not apply if
Employment Rights Act 1996, Section 108. Official text

Statute text as of October 25, 2026

Countries not in this table yet

The United States, France, Spain, Austria and the Netherlands are left out: the ingested texts either do not state a service condition for dismissal protection or the relevant acts (for example the Austrian Arbeitsverfassungsgesetz) are not ingested.

How this table was built

Every row is taken from the official, consolidated text of the statute, which LawAsked loads from each government’s legislation service.

Each figure is tied to a passage quoted word for word from that text. When the page is served, it checks that every quoted passage is still in the current text of a law that is in force; if a law is amended and its wording changes, that row is hidden until a person reviews it again.

The table shows the statutory minimum only. Collective agreements, awards and individual contracts often give more than the statute, and some countries let a collective agreement set different terms.

Use this data

Download the table as CSV

The table and the CSV are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit LawAsked and link to this page. Quoted statute text stays under the terms of its official source.

How to cite this page

LawAsked, “How long you must work before unfair dismissal protection applies, by country”, https://lawasked.com/guides/unfair-dismissal-qualifying-period (reviewed October 25, 2026).

Important Legal Disclaimer

General legal information, not formal legal advice. The information provided on LawAsked does not constitute formal legal advice and creates no attorney-client relationship. If you require legal assistance, please consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.